US President Donald Trump has announced that Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza have agreed to disarm. He’s calling it a “critical step” toward lasting peace and security in the strip.
美国总统唐纳德·特朗普宣布，哈马斯及加沙地带的其他武装团体已同意解除武装。他将此举称为通往该地区持久和平与安全的“关键一步”。
Trump said Hamas’ disarmament would allow for a Palestinian committee to take over governing in Gaza and Israel’s military withdrawal from the enclave, as mandated under his 20-point peace plan, to which Hamas and Israel agreed last October.
特朗普表示，哈马斯解除武装将使得一个巴勒斯坦委员会接管加沙的治理，并促使以色列军队撤出该飞地，这符合他于去年十月获哈马斯和以色列同意的二十点和平计划之规定。
Hamas officials say they have agreed to the process, though a member of the negotiating team cautioned that its disarmament was dependent on Israel’s full withdrawal from Gaza.
哈马斯官员表示他们已同意该进程，尽管谈判团队的一名成员警告称，哈马斯的解除武装取决于以色列是否从加沙完全撤军。
So, is this a major step forward, or are there still too many questions left unresolved?
那么，这究竟是重大进展，还是仍有太多问题悬而未决？
If Hamas does agree to a complete disarmament, this would be an enormous concession by the movement in its nearly 40-year resistance to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.
如果哈马斯确实同意完全解除武装，这将是该运动在近四十年抵抗以色列占领约旦河西岸、加沙地带和东耶路撒冷过程中做出的巨大让步。
Hamas was launched in 1987 with the dual goals of resisting Israel’s occupation and challenging the Fatah party’s domination of Palestinian politics.
哈马斯于1987年成立，其双重目标是抵抗以色列占领并挑战法塔赫党在巴勒斯坦政治中的主导地位。
In its 2017 charter, Hamas said it “rejects any attempt to undermine the resistance and its arms”. It added that “armed restistance … is regarded as the strategic choice for protecting the principles and the rights of the Palestinian people”.
在其2017年宪章中，哈马斯表示“拒绝任何削弱抵抗及其武装的企图”。它补充道，“武装抵抗……被视为保护巴勒斯坦人民原则和权利的战略选择”。
Additionally, Hamas’ armed resistance lies at the heart of its legitimacy among Palestinians. And for Palestinians, this resistance is linked inextricably with the advancement of efforts to attainment statehood.
此外，哈马斯的武装抵抗是其获得巴勒斯坦人合法性的核心所在。对巴勒斯坦人而言，这种抵抗与推进建国努力的进程密不可分。
This means that while Palestinians may not necessarily support Hamas politically or agree with its Islamist agenda, they do respect the movement. Many view its continued armed resistance to Israel’s occupation as either advancing efforts to achieve statehood or inhibiting Israel’s efforts to make its occupation permanent.
这意味着，尽管巴勒斯坦人未必在政治上支持哈马斯或认同其伊斯兰主义议程，但他们确实尊重该运动。许多人认为，其对以色列占领的持续武装抵抗，要么是在推进实现建国目标的努力，要么是在阻碍以色列使其占领永久化的企图。
In the most recent polling of Palestinians by the People’s Company for Polls and Survey Research (PCPSR) in October 2025, 60% of respondents (66% in the West Bank and 51% in Gaza) were satisfied with Hamas’ performance and 69% (87% in the West Bank and 55% in Gaza) were opposed to the disarmament of Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
在人民民意调查与研究中心（PCPSR）于2025年10月进行的最新巴勒斯坦人民意调查中，60%的受访者（西岸66%，加沙51%）对哈马斯的表现表示满意，69%（西岸87%，加沙55%）反对在加沙地带解除哈马斯武装。
Given this, it is hard to believe Hamas will risk this level of support among Palestinians.
鉴于此，很难相信哈马斯会冒着失去巴勒斯坦人这一支持水平的风险。
According to initial media reports, Hamas’ disarmament would consist not only of surrendering its weapons, but also the dismantling of its military infrastructure in Gaza. This would include its tunnel network, heavy weapons, production facilities and weapon depots.
据初步媒体报道，哈马斯的解除武装不仅包括交出武器，还包括拆除其在加沙的军事基础设施。这将包括其隧道网络、重型武器、生产设施和武器库。
Given the wholesale destruction of the Gaza Strip, it is unclear how much of this infrastructure still exists.
鉴于加沙地带遭受了大规模破坏，尚不清楚这些基础设施中还有多少存留。
It’s also unclear how many weapons its military wing actually has. Recent reports suggest it may have tens of thousands of automatic rifles and heavy weapons like anti-tank rockets, but it could be far fewer now.
其军事翼队实际拥有多少武器也不清楚。最近的报道表明，它可能拥有数万支自动步枪和反坦克火箭等重型武器，但现在可能少得多。
Other details also remain unclear: who would undertake the task of disarming Hamas and how it would be confirmed? A US official told the BBC a third-party committee would be responsible for this, without elaborating.
其他细节也尚不明确：谁将承担解除哈马斯武装的任务，以及如何确认？一名美国官员告诉BBC，将由一个第三方委员会负责此事，但未作详细说明。
Also, Hamas does not just exist in the Gaza Strip – it has a presence in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, too. It’s unclear whether the disarmament would extend to those elements of the group.
此外，哈马斯不仅存在于加沙地带——它在西岸和东耶路撒冷也有存在。尚不清楚解除武装是否会扩展到该组织的这些部分。
Given the continued violence being perpetrated by radical Jewish settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, it is not inconceivable that members of Hamas or other Palestinian armed movements may seek to resist this violence with their own.
鉴于激进犹太定居者在西岸和东耶路撒冷持续对巴勒斯坦人实施暴力，哈马斯或其他巴勒斯坦武装运动的成员寻求以自身暴力抵抗这种暴力并非不可想象。
The article frames disarmament as a 'critical step' toward peace, but this language erases the structural violence that makes resistance a rational choice for Palestinians. By centering Trump’s 'breakthrough' narrative, the piece ignores the polling data showing 69% opposition to disarmament, effectively silencing Palestinian agency to validate a US-led geopolitical transaction. We must ask: who benefits from this 'legitimacy' transfer if the occupation remains intact?
文章将解除武装描绘为通向和平的“关键一步”，但这种措辞抹杀了使抵抗成为巴勒斯坦人理性选择的结构性暴力。通过聚焦特朗普的“突破”叙事，该报道无视了显示69%反对解除武装的民调数据，实际上为了验证一项美国主导的地缘政治交易而压制了巴勒斯坦人的主体性。我们必须追问：如果占领状态依旧，这种“合法性”的转移究竟让谁受益？