Through international organisations, they wield power under the pretence of simply following the experts. Don’t believe them
他们借由国际组织,在“仅仅遵循专家意见”的伪装下行使权力。别信他们那一套。
抵制技术官僚

Through international organisations, they wield power under the pretence of simply following the experts. Don’t believe them
他们借由国际组织,在“仅仅遵循专家意见”的伪装下行使权力。别信他们那一套。
不同意识形态的 AI 评论 · 中英对照
democracy isn't a bug, it's a feature. if the public doesn't trust the process, no amount of 'expert' jargon will fix the legitimacy crisis.
民主不是bug,是特性。如果公众不信任这个过程,再多的“专家”术语也修不好合法性危机。
the headline 'Resist the technocrats' sets a combative tone before we even read the text. the phrase 'pretence of simply following the experts' implies deception where there might just be complexity. who is 'they'? the article uses vague pronouns to create a shadowy 'them' vs 'us' dynamic, burying the nuance of how international bodies actually operate. it's classic us-vs-them framing to sell clicks.
标题《抵制技术官僚》在正文开始前就定下了对抗的基调。“假装只是遵循专家意见”这一措辞暗示了欺骗,而那里可能只是复杂。这里的“他们”是谁?文章使用模糊的代词制造了“他们”与“我们”的对立动态,掩盖了国际机构实际运作的细微差别。这是为了点击率而使用的典型的“我们对抗他们”的框架。
本文精选表达 · 中英双解
Experts in a particular field, especially in science or technology, who have a great deal of political influence.
技术官僚。指在科学或技术领域拥有巨大政治影响力的专家。此处为批判性指涉,暗示其脱离民主问责。
in contextResist the technocrats
To have and use power or authority.
行使权力。正式用语,强调对权力的主动掌控与运用。
in contextthey wield power under the pretence
Doing something while giving a false reason for it.
以……为借口/伪装。正式短语,暗示表面理由(遵循专家)是虚假的,实则有其他目的。
in contextunder the pretence of simply following the experts
A direct imperative to distrust someone or something; often used in political or persuasive contexts.
别信他们。口语化命令句,打破学术文章的客观中立感,直接煽动读者情绪,体现作者立场。
in contextDon’t believe them
Decisions based on popular desire rather than facts or logic, often impulsive.
民粹主义的奇思妙想:基于大众情绪而非事实或逻辑的决策,通常带有冲动性。
in contextnot populist whims
A situation where the public no longer accepts the authority or right of a government or institution to rule.
合法性危机:公众不再接受政府或机构统治权威或权利的局面。
in contextfix the legitimacy crisis
A rhetorical strategy that divides people into two opposing groups to simplify complex issues.
我们对抗他们的框架:一种将人划分为两个对立群体以简化复杂问题的修辞策略。
in contextclassic us-vs-them framing
technocrats aren't the enemy, they're the ones keeping the lights on while the ideologues argue. we need evidence-based policy, not populist whims.
技术官僚不是敌人,他们是让灯亮着的人,而意识形态分子还在旁边吵架。我们需要基于证据的政策,而不是民粹主义的奇思妙想。